Soriku said:
Lone_Canis_Lupus said:
TheBigFatJ said:
He's saying MS paid Square, but that's just pandering to fanboys and he knows it's probably not true. Even if it were, he wouldn't know about it.
Microsoft wants success in Japan badly. If they paid Square, don't you think they would have gotten Japan? More likely, they didn't pay Square and Square is just disappointed in the PS3's sales figures and made a savvy business decision.
Here is the difference between MS buying this and winning it: primary Final Fantasy games will all likely come out on the 360 in the future and future MS consoles, and may even become 360-first. If Final Fantasy 13 sells better than the 360, what if it becomes 360 first? Then will MS accuse Sony of buying into it?
Whatever, it's just fanboy fodder. Something for them to believe and something completely irrelevant which is intended to increase hatred of Microsoft rather than disappointment in Sony.
Sony fans should be disappointed in Sony if they care about this issue, not angry at Microsoft. It's Sony who lost exclusivity of the franchise.
|
Oh, it's SONY's fault that it went multiplatform? Sony INTENTIONALY lost exclusivity of the title? Hah, you make me laugh.
|
Well...Sony could've always thrown money at them to keep it exclusive but as someone said earlier im the thread I bet SE refused Sony and thought MS's way was a smarter choice for them...
@Kasz
Oh. I thought they'd tell them something because someone said yesterday if they don't tell their share holders any info then the share holders could sue them...
|
Whether or not MS and Sony had a money fight, in the end it was Squares choice. To blame Sony for losing exclusivity to the game is stupid.
