bonkers555 said:
Like how Square-Enix and Konami stabbing Nintendo in the back? What goes around come around. |
SE going to Sony was a completely logical move profit wise due to the cartridge vs. CD issue. This move isn't. Now because FFXIII is going to the 360, PS3 owners have to wait until the 360 version is done before they can play it; which doesn't make sense from a profit standpoint because the PS3 version is already/almost done.
Edit:Meaning, if SE releases it sooner for the PS3 version, they will get more profit due to the game just being OUT there sooner.
The Last Remnant is a timed exclusive for the 360. The 360 version was easier for SE to make, so they're going to release it first since it seems to be done. This is actually a smart decision profit wise.
Look at these two incidents and see what an actual backstabbing is. Both of these incidents hurt Sony and help MS. The first not making any sense from a profit standpoint which hurts Sony, the second which obviously does make sense and hurts Sony.
If both of these didn't make any sense, it might imply that SE was making poor decisions. If both of them made perfect sense, there would be no fault whatsoever. But now that there is a definite split for favoritism, it's obvious.
The only constant in these two events is that both hurt Sony and help MS. SE won't even get the maximum amount of profit from doing this. This implies that MS did indeed help SE in some manner to favor them over Sony.
There was no such thing evident like this during 1996. SE would've been screwed if they stuck with Nintendo, FF7 would have cost an enormous amount and they would be out of business. "What goes around comes around"? It has to go around first
This will only take a moment of your time. *steals your watch*
