Griffin said:
selnor said:
What a wierd E3. Who would have thought that Nintendo would shun the core gamers? Who would have thought that the PS3 was basically a shooters console? Who would have thought that M$ would have the more diverse lineup?
E3 major points.
1. Live is so far ahead of PSN now it's nearly embarrassing.
3. M$ proved that graphically 360 is right up there (and actually Gears2 was the best detailed ingame footage of any console yet) with PS3.
6. Sony concentrated on Spring 2009 onwards.
8. Sony as usual used alot of CGI cutscenes.
9. M$ had the most playable stuff in their conference.
10. M$ walked E3.
|
1) lol, don't be a fool, Live is a tiny bit ahead of PSN and it cost over $60 a year.
wow 5$ for one month... you're really poor. And it's not a "tiny bit" ahead. It is ahead.
3) lol, Gears2 looks so similar to gears1 its embarrasing, so many PS3 games blow it away.
The level in that movie looked better than everything in the first GEoW. If they keep up the good work I can easily see 95% on Gamerankings and 7 million lifetime sales.
8) Name them, the only 1 i remember is the MAG with its 256 online mode, i guess you must be upset the best the 360 has is the gears2 showing with 5 player battle mode against bots 
FAIL. Of course you playing against bots. IT'S A SINGLEPLAYER GAME !!!!!
@ 9&10, LoL, your fanboy vision is confusing you.
MS had some playable stuff and is for me winner of E3. (Even though Sony showed more games)
|
