By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
selnor said:
Griffin said:
selnor said:

What a wierd E3. Who would have thought that Nintendo would shun the core gamers? Who would have thought that the PS3 was basically a shooters console? Who would have thought that M$ would have the more diverse lineup?

E3 major points.

1. Live is so far ahead of PSN now it's nearly embarrassing.

3. M$ proved that graphically 360 is right up there (and actually Gears2 was the best detailed ingame footage of any console yet) with PS3.

6. Sony concentrated on Spring 2009 onwards.

8. Sony as usual used alot of CGI cutscenes.

9. M$ had the most playable stuff in their conference.

10. M$ walked E3.

 

1) lol, don't be a fool, Live is a tiny bit ahead of PSN and it cost over $60 a year.

3) lol, Gears2 looks so similar to gears1 its embarrasing, so many PS3 games blow it away.

6) lol again, maybe you should watch the conference, Sony showed so many games coming out this year.

8) Name them, the only 1 i remember is the MAG with its 256 online mode, i guess you must be upset the best the 360 has is the gears2 showing with 5 player battle mode against bots

@ 9&10, LoL, your fanboy vision is confusing you.


I knew alot of sony fans would be like ub bu bu bu the cell. LOL Fable 2 was amazing graphically as well, but i huess because the art style isnt for realism you will try and say it's nowhere near. Did you see the lighting coming through the trees? And Gears 2 like 1?. hahahahahaha. Where in the hell did yu see detailed environments like that in Gears 1. Damage control is here at the max on VGchartz.

 

 

 

I love the art style of fable, it has some of the best art style i have seen in gaming history.  And i never mentioned one thing about the cell, and i have never mentioned a single thing on this site about the cell in my entire posting History. And i was looking at the light coming through the trees then all of a sudden the other half of the tree would show up when you got within 20 feet of it.  Maybe the graphics were better then average and the game had some nice effects but the pop-in needs to be removed before the game comes out this fall.  And maybe my comment about gears2 was wrong, i was just pissed about something in another game thread and was not reading what i was posting. 

The gears2 game looked nice, but the one thing about UE3 is they focus too much on the Textures and leave out important effects on other parts.  The game just looks too clean and i don't feel like i'm in a warzone, i just bought UT3 this week and it has the exact same feel as Gears2.  But the lighting engine in gears2 appears to be better then the one used in Ut3.  But i have not downloaded the TPS add-on so far so once i get that it will be more easy to judge the games to each other.