selnor said:
I knew alot of sony fans would be like ub bu bu bu the cell. LOL Fable 2 was amazing graphically as well, but i huess because the art style isnt for realism you will try and say it's nowhere near. Did you see the lighting coming through the trees? And Gears 2 like 1?. hahahahahaha. Where in the hell did yu see detailed environments like that in Gears 1. Damage control is here at the max on VGchartz.
|
I love the art style of fable, it has some of the best art style i have seen in gaming history. And i never mentioned one thing about the cell, and i have never mentioned a single thing on this site about the cell in my entire posting History. And i was looking at the light coming through the trees then all of a sudden the other half of the tree would show up when you got within 20 feet of it. Maybe the graphics were better then average and the game had some nice effects but the pop-in needs to be removed before the game comes out this fall. And maybe my comment about gears2 was wrong, i was just pissed about something in another game thread and was not reading what i was posting.
The gears2 game looked nice, but the one thing about UE3 is they focus too much on the Textures and leave out important effects on other parts. The game just looks too clean and i don't feel like i'm in a warzone, i just bought UT3 this week and it has the exact same feel as Gears2. But the lighting engine in gears2 appears to be better then the one used in Ut3. But i have not downloaded the TPS add-on so far so once i get that it will be more easy to judge the games to each other.








