mancandy on 12 March 2007
auroragb said:
Sintinel said:Oh, well I was unaware of that. So let me get this straight.
Basically, all of your evidence is speculation, and you don't have one single bit of solid data to back up your claim.
Did I get that right?
Erm,
Fact: Chris Hecker did work in many senior / hi profile positions
Fact: Such people don't do that without understanding politics
Fact: Invited speakers to events often prepare for events they speak at
Fact: Chris Hecker researched term art in x360/ps3/wii official sites
Fact: EA has until recently devoted least resources to Wii of the 3 current consoles (x360, ps3, wii)
Fact: EA has poor financials in recent quarters.
Fact: Large companies with weak financials tend to not like making additional investment
Fact: Hecker made a retraction. Most agree it was at behest of his employer (EA/Maxis)
Fact: People told to say something can be told to say something totally opposite (ie. Tony Snow)
Theory: Chris Hecker made original statement at behest of EA
Reformatted for clarity, so what's your point? There is ample evidence listed. Plenty of fertile grounds for the theory. I might not have Halloween papers, but plenty of evidence to support motive. Where is your evidence for believing otherwise?
FACT: EA bought company to make only Wii games
http://www.gamespot.com/news/6162544.html
FACT: EA is not weak financially
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=ERTS&annual
Wii Code 8761-5941-4718-0078







