| CaptainExplosion said: No, I was inferring that you would glorify fucking animals because they're sentient. Excuse me for not knowing the difference between two words that mean basically the same thing. If we're reducing ourselves to petty accusations, then how about I accuse you and others like you of wanting the economy to crash or wanting more war crimes? After all, that's what will happen because of your precious AI. End of discussion, now get out of my thread, and never speak to me again so I can do the same with you. |
"Glorify" is an odd word, but yes I think it is ethical to value sentient life over non-sentient life (pragmatically, with some ecological limits) and non-life and it is inter-subjectively good to aim to reduce pain felt by it.
The words don't "mean basically the same thing." You still don't understand them if you think that.
I can post in a public thread. You don't own it. It's not yours. You're the one who replied to me originally, the one incapable of having a good faith conversation on this topic (across many threads, not just the one you think you own), and the one who starts throwing around inflammatory statements like "And if animals are truly sentient, what are you gonna say is ok next, bestiality?" and "I read it, but it still sounds absolutely stupid."
If you don't want me to reply, then don't reply to me then.
