Norion said:
| Shadow1980 said: Pretty much all of this. I wrote a long post about this a couple of months ago, so I'll keep it short-ish, but so-called "A.I." is indeed a massive net negative. All of this destruction, all of this effort to force Plagiarism Bot 3000 on us, as if every new gee-whiz tech fad from Silicon Valley has to be "THE INEVITABLE FUTURE™ SO GET USED TO IT, LUDDITE!!!" They don't care if they have to destroy everything from the environment to the very soul of human creativity in the process. "A.I." reeks of a get-rich-quick scheme, a desperate last-ditch attempt at making the line go up in a moribund economic system. Capitalism will be the death of us all, and fossil fuel and tech companies are leading the charge. If it were up to me, "A.I" would be banned and all those new data centers being put up would be bulldozed and replaced with something actually useful. |
This is an incredibly ignorant thing to say. I've already gone into this with Curl earlier in the thread so won't go in depth again here but there are tons of useful applications of the technology, including in extremely important areas like the medical field. |
I have to agree. There were plenty of people against industrial revolution and computing revolution, as well. Some of people are afraid of change. There's no way to progress if the humanity won't experiment and try new things. That's natural part of growth IMO.
Anyway, returning to the topic. DLSS 5 in current form is no longer an upscaling tech, but something like the re-renderer. Even I, a great supporter of GeForce brand dislike the way how Nvidia promotes this tech. They should rename neural rendering tech a new thing like Reflex is, which is a part of tech stack of RTX brand.
