Chrkeller said:
JRPGfan said:
I play alot of rpgs.... and for the vast majority 30fps is plenty (as long as its a stable locked 30).
Even something like Path of Exile, I lock to it 60 fps.
(I don't need to make my pc strugle to output 120-150fps, get into something hectic and watch it drop down to like mid 50's anyways)
Set it to 60, and it breezes though it (non demanding workloads), and the most demanding situation in the game, only dips a few fps lower.
I like stable frame rates and frame times though. If a game can run really stable frame rates, I would much rather have that, then it running insanely fast, and them going up and down.
Its like people that play Counter strike at 400+ fps.
What is the point? Like if you don't even have a 144hz monitor? I don't get it.... and I'm not into shooters anyways. |
480 hz, and higher, monitors exist. Having said that, for me personally, 90 fps is extremely similar to 120 fps, not a huge jump. But 90 fps blows 60 fps out of the water. |
Sh*t I play mostly on a big screen tv.
I wasn't even sure if it could do 120hz..... I just checked and found out it could (surprised myself there).... lmao.
Anyways its running 60hz atm, and I have been running it that way for along time.
I honestly don't care about fps and refresh rates.
Like I said, I don't play shooters. I don't feel like there any benefit to running say 120hz vs 60 for me.
my tv has HDR too... I don't use it.
