Norion said:
Where did you hear about that? Not saying you're wrong, just that this is the first time I've heard this and yeah RDNA 4 is for sure one of AMD's better lineups in the past decade. They won't age quite as well as the RTX 50 series but the gap will be closer than RDNA 3 and the 40 series and way closer than RDNA 1 and the 20 series so hopefully the gap gets even smaller next time. |
There is plenty of articles around with interviews with AMD where AMD forked Graphics Core Next into CDNA and RDNA in order to build micro/macro-optimizations for those different and specific workloads and market segments, but the engineering resources to maintain that has been an irksome area of contention.
https://overclock3d.net/news/gpu-displays/amd-plans-major-changes-for-radeon-with-united-udna-gpu-architecture-for-data-centers-and-gamers/
It's the same issue AMD had prior to 2015, where the GPU development team was part of the CPU development team to drive their Fusion (APU) initiative, sadly it meant a contention of limited resources which impacted all of AMD's engineering teams.
https://fortune.com/2015/09/09/amd-graphics-chip-split/

www.youtube.com/@Pemalite








