Carzy Zarx’s PC Gaming Emporium - Catch Up on All the Latest PC Gaming Related News

[Jizz_Beard_thePirate]

Pemalite said:

Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:

AMD leaves the door open to FSR 4-like support on RDNA 3

https://videocardz.com/newz/amd-leaves-the-door-open-to-fsr-4-like-support-on-rdna-3

Remember kids, if Radeon is treating RDNA 3 users like shit, they will likely treat RDNA 4 users like shit when RDNA 5 comes out

Keep in mind that only RDNA4 supports FP8 to make optimal use of FSR4.
RDNA3 can use the INT8 path, but it comes with a performance/visual quality tradeoff.

I don't think its about "treating RDNA3 users like shit" rather than there being genuine technical differences between the architectures, it's not like AMD made any promises that RDNA 1/2/3 would get the full blown FSR4 experience either.

I think what AMD needs to do is just make FSR open source and let the community handle it.

Sure it comes with trade offs but let the users decide whether or not the trade offs are worth it. From the reviews of the leaked version, it's a pretty big improvement in image quality even when being used with RDNA3 INT8 compared to FSR 3 which is currently the only official choice.

And sure Radeon hasn't promised anything to anyone so the logic of "you got what you paid for" certainly applies. But personally speaking, when a company like Nvidia is giving options to 2060 users from 2019 to run the latest DLSS models while Radeon doesn't want to give those that spent $1000 on 7900XTX the time of day even though Radeon had a plenty of marketing around the so called "Ai capabilities" of RDNA 3... Yea it really shows how each company supports their user base and it affects the reputation of each company.

Radeon should be working towards a "we are better than Nvidia" reputation in anyway possible given their single digit market share. But if they are going to act like how they have done in the past year, they absolutely deserve that market share imo.