By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
The Ghost of RubangB said:
mr.elite said:
Broncos724 said:

Rubang, you gave an argument based on the 2004 movie "Day After Tomorrow." EPIC FAIL

 

I've been silently reading all of the responses to this thread and as of yet no one has provided a sound, supporting argument for global warming being man-made. In fact, I have never heard a single good supporting argument, and I strongly suspect that's because there aren't any.

To whoever said global warming is a scare tactic used so scientists can continue to have jobs, you are correct. mr.elite

To whoever said human CO2 output completely dwarfs the output by industries, thank you for using common sense. mr.elite

Not to mention that we would be so lucky to have average temperatures rise.

One of the most important things I've learned is that the media is very, very powerful... Yes Read Below

 

Yes. Please read my link. It will turn your heads.

http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/news_press_release,176495.shtml

BTW: The cold kills twice as many people as the heat does.

Since the 1920's deaths per year caused by extreme weather are down 95%.

"It is the greatest scam in history. I m amazed appauled and highly offended by it. Global Warming; it is a scam"

---John Coleman Founder of the Weather Channel speaking out on Global Warming

You do realize that you're linking to an advertisement for a book, right?

Yeah it's a book about scientists who oppose global warming, and I read the whole article (summary) and it didn't convince me of anything. It just said it's hard for them to get attention in the media. They wanted me to then assume it was because it's hip to believe in global warming and faulty science but the truth can't get out, that these mere 500 scientists have discovered. I don't know, maybe it's just a crappy book. Either way, that link was a horrible example. First of all, I dont understand how people dont see that the media IS corrupt. Lets see, what story sells better "Global warming will be earths end" or "Everything is fine with the Earths Climate". Thats the point Media only reports on bad news. These 500 scientists have all found evidence against manmade global warming, but since theres only 500 it isnt valid? Makes sense.

I'm not gonna click every link in your earlier gigantic post. But if you want to give me one or 2 good links, I'll be happy to read them and discuss them. Click them all, they are all relevant

"The cold kills twice as many people as the heat does." Okay. Irrelevant to global warming. No, Global warming would mean less harsh winters meaning less people dying in the cold would it not?

"Since the 1920's deaths per year caused by extreme weather are down 95%." Okay. Irrelevant to global warming. No "Global Warming" is considered an extreme weather condition. If its getting worse, why are deaths falling. (Yes i realize standard or living is WAY higher but even so).

And what's with your constant quoting of John Coleman as if he's credible? Yeah he founded the Weather Channel, so what? He aws the president and CEO when he founded it in 1982, and they kicked him out in only one year. Now he's just a weatherman, like he's been for 26 years. And there's a big difference between wanting to sue somebody and being able to sue somebody at all. He's just a wackjob these days. Not a credible source. Because John Coleman actually has a degree relevant to the weather, not a government/journalism degree.

In fact, if you go to the Weather Channel's web site right now, www.weather.com, there's a link to a Climate & Green section on the front page, and I just took a poll there. It asked "Taking the amount of solar power hitting Earth in 1 hour, how long could you power the world?" 5 minutes, 2 days, or 1 year? I picked one year, and it said "You are correct! That's one whole year! And if you installed 1 kilowatt solar system in your home, each month you'd prevent 300 lbs. of CO2 pollution." and gave me a link to find out more. Looks like the Weather Channel thinks minimizing CO2 pollution is a good idea, and it's only their ex-CEO who's raising a stink. Minimizing Co2 being a good idea is not the point. I agree we should be more innovative harnessing the suns energy as well as cutting back on polution but its not the cause of "global warming"

 

There Fixed it



B