Linking Bondi attack to pro-Palestine marches is dishonest, dangerous
Independent author and journalist Anthony Lowenstein, speaking from Sydney, has condemned the anti-Semitic attack in Bondi Beach during Hanukkah but said he was angered by its swift political weaponisation.
He criticised Australian and Israeli officials for linking the attack to pro-Palestine protests, arguing this falsely conflates anti-Semitism with legitimate criticism of Israel’s actions in Gaza.
ISIS / IS State is not against Jews in particular, it's basically the same doctrine as the extreme version of Christianity and Judaism, to bring about the apocalypse, end-time prophecies, kill all non believers. Which includes Muslims that aren't true believers, not adhering to fundamentalist Sharia law. Christians and Atheists are fair game as well, just as extremist Settlers in the West Bank attack Christian churches as well, or rather make no distinction between Christian Palestinians, Muslim Palestinians or atheists, activists. Us vs them mentality. Where them is everyone that's not Us. Hence no remorse over collateral deaths...
It's a sick 'ideology' on all three sides of the Abrahamic religions. Whether the Bondi beach attack was actually inspired by this 'ideology' is unclear. But it does seem the attackers were recruited by IS State militants in the Philippines. How they got there is still a mystery.
It's a never ending cycle. Religion gets abused to keep people divided, which leads to extremism, which leads to using extremist religious beliefs to recruit terrorists, which leads to politicians pointing at religions as the cause further dividing people.
Pro Palestine marches have nothing to do with all this, nor does anti-semitism have anything do with anti genocide protests. But those in power would rather see Palestinians disappear to further control over the ME so anti-semitism and islamophobia are stoked up to undermine any criticism of Israel's actions. And as a side effect, extremist terrorist organizations get more recruits. Action, re-action.
There are still the other questions as well, why were the attacker's names searched up on Google from Tel Aviv days before the attack. AI now says it has been debunked, this article still raises questions.
https://www.wionews.com/world/bondi-beach-attack-google-trends-naveed-akram-search-anomaly-1765861479778
So was there a search interest for Naveed Akram in Tel Aviv?
At the outset, when we tried to seek evidence for search data on the keyword "Naveed Akram", in Google Trends, we could not find any evidence of the search. Here is the genuinely interesting part: What does not appear in usual search results can be found using a VPN. Which means Google Trends is showing different historical data based on the user's location, which would be unprecedented. So, below are the four screenshots we collected when searching for Naveed Akram from different regions, such as Romania, Canada and Japan.
What does this mean?
There are a few possible explanations, such as active historical data manipulation, or the data is genuinely fluctuating because of processing issues, or different versions are being shown to different users, or different Google server has different versions. However, one thing seems to be popping out: there was a reasonable search interest for the keyword Naveed Akram in Israel, ahead of the Bondi Beach terror attack on December 14. Though this does not prove the terror attack was a 'false flag', or that Israel had orchestrated it. But it hints there is something unusual with the Google trend data, and the name was being discussed within Israel, but it does not reveal the intent and identity of those conducting the searches.
False flag no, egged on or knew about it and didn't tell is another possibility. Just as more and more evidence points to Israel knowing about Oct 7 and telling soldiers to stand down before the attack, then taking many hours to respond. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cg7825rk8j9o
Whether the Bondi Beach attack is linked at all to what's happening in Israel-Gaza is of course unclear. The only thing that is clear is that Israel is politicizing the terrorist attack to blame Pro Palestinian marches for the rise in anti-semitism.
