JEMC said:
Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:
Personally I haven't seen much of a reason to recommend Radeon over Nvidia outside of definitive wins like 9070 vs 5070 since the 12gb of vram is too much of a cuck. Nvidias RTX features including DLSS and Ray Tracing are now available in over 860 games/apps.
Reflex itself is available in over 150 games vs less than 25 for Anti lag 2 and over 95 for FSR4. You could include fsr1/2/3 titles but unless we are kidding ourselves, all 3 of those have been proven to be garbage so recommending someone based on those 3 fsr versions is doing them a disservice imo.
The other issue is Radeon themselves and their track record. Last year their carelessness got peoples accounts banned with anti lag 2. This year, they tried to cuck rdna 2 and 1 from getting day 1 driver updates. Neither of those are likely to get FSR4. Meanwhile Turing which released before RDNA 1 in 2018 has gotten DLSS 4 transformer model.
I could go on but I don't really see the point in recommending Radeon products unless there's a big price gap or the Nvidia counterpart is severely cucked. They aren't Ryzen offering 8 cores for the price of 4 cores, 4-5 years of socket support vs 2 years from intel. Etc. Radeons worst enemy is it's leadership making stupid decisions instead of being long term focused. |
I agree with your points but, and I'm fully aware that this is my very personal opinion, to me, buying any of the Nvidia 5000 series would be like a validation of their hideous marketing campaign, with those 5070=4090 slides or the ones comparing cards running native versus DLSS and frame gen. And I don't want to reward a company that lies so blatantly to my face. |
Out of all the reasons to not buy Nvidia, I feel like marketing shouldn't be the main reason since both companies miss lead customers. Like you would actually rather support a company that tried to screw people who bought their gpu from 3 years ago with driver updates and who are unlikely to get fsr4 over Nvidia's marketing nonsense? Really? Come on man lol
