Carzy Zarx’s PC Gaming Emporium - Catch Up on All the Latest PC Gaming Related News

[JEMC]

^Thanks, Rhonin!

Pemalite said:

JEMC said:

No site is reliable all the time, even more so if the talk about future products.

With that said, the article you've posted as an example is clearly labeled as a rumor, not a leak or an announcement, and both the DP 2.1 and the TSMC 3nm details came straight from Kopite, who shared them in two tweets featured in the article.

The 384-bit bus memory was the rumor back then, likely also coming from a previous post by Kopite (videocardz link here), who later came up with the 512-bit bus update.

At this point, you may as well say that Kopite is an unreliable source of info which, as a leaker, it's something anyone with common sense should take for granted. There are leakers that get more things right than wrong, and he's one of them, but no one has a 100% correct track record.

As for using AI to write articles and create pics, I didn't know that and it's a shame. If you have better sources for those kinds of leaks, it would be great if you could share them with the rest of us.

That's precisely the issue I have. 
Sites posting entire articles based on rumors and making full blown articles out of it where people run with it and try to propagate it as fact is building false-hype.
"Fake news" if you will.

Videocarz.com also uses A.I to write some articles and uses A.I. to generate images for said article, not that A.I is intrinsically wrong, it's just removing the human emotion from building articles with unique takes on issues.

But they clearly state at the top of the article that it's a rumor. It's up to the reader to decide to believe it or not.

And at least they don't come up with their own rumors from "their sources". They make articles based on what some, but not all, leakers say and reference them to show where they got the info they're posting from. That's already more than what some professional journalists do nowadays.

I also disagree with you about using the "fake news" expression here. The way it's generaly used is to downplay actual, real information that don't align with your views or that damage your image or credibility. At worse you could use "wrong news" but, then again, that's part of the nature of rumors.

I already said thatit's a shame that they use AI to write their articles and make images for them, there's not much else I can add to that.

Lastly, I'd still like to know if you're aware of better sources for those kinds of articles.

Last edited by JEMC - on 07 October 2025