By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Jackson50 said:

"Namco did a much better job of Starfox on the GC than Rare did for any except the original."

According to Metacritic, you are incorrect in your assessment. The Namco Star Fox game (Assault) received a cumulative score of 67, whereas the Rare Star Fox game received a cumulative score of 82. Ergo, Namco did not do a "much better job".

Also, what is up with everyone saying Rare sucks? They may not have released any great games (Viva Pinata excluded) recently like Battletoads, Goldeneye or Perfect Dark, but they do not "suck" as most people seem to purport. I think Kameo and PD Zero were above average games, and their most recent game for the X360 (Viva Pinata) was exquisite.

Wait, so you're telling me that a bunch of college kids and teenagers  are going to tell the population what's better? As a game developer myself, I can tell you that the production value was much better by Namco than Rare. A bunch of biased numbers by some random video geeks does nothing to inform me of what truly is the better game. In other words, ratings are useless, play the games and find out for yourself.