Pemalite said:
You are missing the point. The EULA was an EXAMPLE of how a company written document does not override your rights as a consumer. |
Ok so now you are claiming that all contracts are null and void so long as someone makes a 2nd hand purchase? Can you cite a lawyer or court case demonstrating your claim?
If company A leases a car, from company B and then sells me that car, company B has no right to getting their car back? Is that how that works? Is that your argument?
Why do you believe everything based on a single faulty source? Why are you so gullible? Stop acting as if the things written in the Time Extension article are established fact.
It's not a genuine question it is a loaded question, because it presupposes that everything written in the Time Extension article is factual. It presupposes that Sega is guilty. https://www.logicalfallacies.org/loaded-question.html
It's even dumber than that because if you presume that everything in the article is factual then the dev kits stilled belonged to Nintendo and thus Sega had no right to sell them.
Either Time Extension is to be taken as fact or not. If Time Extension is not to be taken as fact then the claims against Sega have no merit. If Time Extension is to be taken as fact then it is a fact that Sega did not own the dev kits. And if Sega did not own the dev kits then the purchase was not legitimate.
Do you realize how bad it is to have a source that contradicts itself as badly as Time Extension does? Stop treating TE like it's gospel.
Last edited by Cerebralbore101 - on 14 September 2025






