Pemalite said:
Cerebralbore101 said:
You are assuming Sega screwed up at all. Do you have proof that a Sega employee was authorized by Sega to dispose of the items or sell the items? What legal code can you quote saying, "These dev kits were the rightful property of either Sega or the scrapyard (and not Nintendo's property)?"
You are the one being illogical here by jumping to conclusions based solely on the testimony of the accused reseller. And by ignoring property laws. Let's wait until more information comes out before trying to pin the blame on Sega. As for the reseller, for the third time, he would have known full well that he was buying property that couldn't be legally sold. Again, He was buying property that he knew full well couldn't be legally sold by Sega, or the scrapyard.Â
|
Read the article.
It was legitimately acquired. Sega was incompetent.Â
Either way, we will find out when this stupid lawsuit sorts it all out or gets settled. Hopefully it doesn't ruin someones life forever.
|
Darc Requiem said:
Cerebralbore101 said:
You are assuming Sega screwed up at all. Do you have proof that a Sega employee was authorized by Sega to dispose of the items or sell the items? What legal code can you quote saying, "These dev kits were the rightful property of either Sega or the scrapyard (and not Nintendo's property)?"
You are the one being illogical here by jumping to conclusions based solely on the testimony of the accused reseller. And by ignoring property laws. Let's wait until more information comes out before trying to pin the blame on Sega. As for the reseller, for the third time, he would have known full well that he was buying property that couldn't be legally sold. Again, He was buying property that he knew full well couldn't be legally sold by Sega, or the scrapyard.Â
|
Did you read the article? I've seen your back and forth with Pemalite. I really dont get how you could make your posts after reading the article.Â
|
Did you two read the article? Let me help you with that.
And like I said before... It is common knowledge among game resellers that these dev kits are not to be sold to the public. So the reseller knew full well he was conducting an illegal purchase of Nintendo's property. That's the bottom line, unless you can quote some legal loophole in the U.K. that magically makes the dev kits the property of Sega or the scrap yard or a Sega employee.
If I borrow a game from you and sell it a garage sale and the purchaser knows it is not mine is that a legitimate purchase?
Last edited by Cerebralbore101 - on 12 September 2025
