By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
ArchangelMadzz said:
pokoko said:

Are we playing dumb and pretending that "perfect" was mentioned at all?  Is this what we're doing? 

If you can't answer the question then say so, don't make shit up just to fit your narrative.  

You're 100% right there my mistake!

Unfortunately it doesn't change the point being made, there is no situation where we should be using someone as a posterchild for great genes. Especially not when we have a massive increase in antisemitism and using blonde hair and blue eyes as an example of great genes when Nazi ideology is on the rise.

Does that answer your question?

Nowhere is being a Nazi defined by blue eyes or blonde hair so the idea that someone should be penalized for it is ridiculous.  Even if it was defined by that, no one should be made to feel ashamed of their DNA, which is what people are trying to do here.  This is absolutely an attempt to shame her for her features.  If the model had been Iranian--who were also accepted by the Nazi party--with dark eyes and hair then no one would be saying a word about it.  If she were overweight then the same people slamming her would be cheering her instead.

Personally, I don't think a person should be attacked for something that happened a long time ago, especially when her ancestors weren't even a part of it. 

I mean, telling someone else they can't do something because of their eye and hair color sounds more in line with Nazi beliefs than anything.