My criticism of AI gets more pushback than actual AI here because apparently I'm "criticising wrong" or something. It's all well and good shoving a little criticism of AI in responses but those responses are often in debate against someone critical of AI. The thing that would push people back from criticising AI in here is if every time they do they get jumped on with pointless debate about them criticising wrongly.
Instead of criticising companies for treating employees like shit and using AI slop, we are know focused on debating each other on some stupid debate about the correct formula for criticising a company, no longer focused on the actual issue at hand and calling out these companies, instead we're now focused on each other and criticism moves away from Microsoft and others. *Slow Clap*
Also my comments on the King situation is literally comments that I've seen from multiple developers who work with AI, I don't think I said anything wrong when it comes straight from people who actually work with AI, Lol. It can't yet replace them and Microsoft will need to rehire a lot of people and then lay them off again then rehire them. Microsoft knows this, they, a tech company, still have more employees than ever despite their best efforts to reduce their headcount. AI will maybe be capable of mass replacement in the future but it isn't there *now*
