Who did more damage to Xbox's console business: Don Mattrick or Phil Spencer?

[xboxgreen]

curl-6 said:

Trentonater said:

the 360 era was something Don inhereted really. He can still be blamed for the second half of the 360's life having a total dearth of games after it started off so well. His biggest success of the Kinect ended up being a fad that held them back in the long run.

This I'd have to disagree with; the second half of the 360's life saw the likes of Gears of War 3 and Judgement, Halo Reach and 4, Forza 4 and Horizon, Alan Wake, Fable III, Splinter Cell Conviction, Crackdown 2, State of Decay, Trials Evolution, etc, as well as great third party titles like Mass Effect 2 + 3, Bioshock Infinite, Skyrim, Portal 2, Witcher 2, etc.

I thought second half was okay, but disappointing. Gears 3, Reach, Horizon, and Forza 4 was good. However everything else was mediocre. 


As an Xbox series consoles fan, I thought the 360 was overrated. I like the controller and Xbox live / UI. However, the faulty hardware, pay for online and lack of anything compelling outside of Halo, Gears, and Forza was aggravating.

I may seem like a hypocrite because I like the Xbox Series consoles, but Game pass makes all the difference imo.