By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

UNRWA renews call for Israel to lift blockade on Gaza

The UN Relief and Works Agency, the backbone of Palestinian humanitarian aid, has urged Israel to lift the Gaza “siege”, which has prevented the delivery of much-needed humanitarian aid to the estimated two million Palestinians in the territory.

“UNRWA remains the lifeline to people in Gaza,” the UN agency posted on its account on X. “Since the war began in Gaza, UNRWA has never stopped working – not through bombardment, displacement, or despair,” it added.

At present, humanitarian aid in Gaza is being delivered by the US-backed Israeli organisation Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), which is accused of causing the deaths of hundreds of Palestinians waiting for food aid.

Well-known aid groups and the UN have refused to work with the new organisation, saying it violates basic humanitarian principles by coordinating delivery with Israeli troops backed by privately hired and armed US security personnel.



GHF staff could be criminally liable for aid seeker deaths, says rights lawyer

A human rights lawyer says staff working for the controversial group behind the violence-plagued aid distribution programme in Gaza could be held criminally liable for complicity in war crimes.

Speaking to Al Jazeera from London, Kate Mackintosh, executive director of the UCLA Law Promise Institute Europe, said that the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) could bear criminal liability for the killings of hundreds of aid seekers near its distribution points.

“It’s very unclear why these people are being targeted and killed, but I think it’s pretty clear that these are unarmed civilians who are desperately trying to get food for their families,” she said.

“Firing upon people in that situation prima facie is a war crime.” She said that people working for the GHD would “have to think about the extent to which they could be complicit in those crimes”.

“If they’re aware that this is going to happen – or even in some jurisdictions they’re aware of the substantial risk of this happening, which it seems they must be, given what we’ve seen since these operations began – then they could be held criminally liable for participating in those crimes.”