By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
haxxiy on 25 June 2025
Edit Thread
JEMC said:

I really hope those claims for UDNA/RDNA5 are legit, but when it comes to AMD GPUs, you have to take those leaks with huge amounts of salt.

After all, that's what they're trying to achieve, their goal, and they have failed before (RDNA3 was supposed to bring another 2x performance per watt jump over RDNA2 like the later did over RDNA1, but it fell short of that by quite a lot).

UDNA is CDNA-based plus it's the architecture Sony and MS have a stake on, just like RDNA2. Besides, it's just the same leap as RDNA4 vs. RDNA3.

So it's pretty beliveable especially given how much money CDNA is getting vs. the pennies the RDNA folks work with, TBH.