JEMC said:
Makes complete sense. Nintendo is really pushing the boundaries of its customers with that asking price (let's not bring the games into the question), and I don't know how well they'll do. Sure, the launch will be a success but, once the more die-hard followers have bought it, I think it will be hard for Nintendo to convince the rest of the market to pay as much for the console. And if we've learned something from this gen of consoles, is that they don't go down in price, quite the opposite. Waiting for a Lite may be an option, but it will likely come in what, 2 or 3 years? And how much will it cost, $350 USD? Until then, an Ally could be a great option. Even more, having an Ally could make you play games you already have but haven't touched yet, as they could be better suited for the kind of experience you get by playing on the go. With that said, didn't you buy a Steam Deck (for the second time) not too long ago? Or am I confusing you with someone else? |
The pricing of dedicated gaming devices does feel quite strange this time around. Both PS5 Pro and Switch 2 really do cost similar to PCs. Yea an equivalently priced PC might not perform as well perhaps but both of these devices feel hard to justify as single purpose devices when PCs offer so much more than only gaming. Gaming is starting to no longer feel cheap.
Yea I had a steam deck oled which I sold after a while lol. With the wife around, it wasn't being used very often as me and her do most of the things together so a bigger screen like a laptop was better for us. I bought the vivobook pro oled which comes with an i9, 4060, 2880 x 1620p 120hz oled display for a relatively cheap price when it was on sale. We mainly use it during travel or on our bed and such.
https://www.asus.com/ca-en/laptops/for-home/vivobook/asus-vivobook-pro-15-oled-n6506/
PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850







