By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
curl-6 said:
JRPGfan said:

Supposedly its 3Tflops docked.
Digital Foundry is saying, that compaired to RDNA2 (the PS5), this would be like a ~2.5 Tflop machine (compared to the PS5's 10.2).

Switch 2 also has less memory, memory bandwidth, storage, ect ect ect.

Its not a bargin, in terms of specs of the machine your getting.
In a sense, your getting 1/3-1/4th of a PS5, in terms of performance.
And its not like the PS5 costs 3 times as much.

Most people value consoles in terms of games, not teraflops; the Switch was the same price as PS4, only like 1/4 as powerful, but Switch sold way more.

Hell, the Series X is a beast in terms of flops but clearly the market sees it as undesirable.

The 1st Switch was ~397 Gflops (I think it was?) compaired to the 1,84 Tflops of the PS4.
That was more like 1/5th of a PS4.
The Switch 2 is actually closer to the PS5, than the Switch was to the PS4.
(and with up-scaling. its def. in a better spot to get good looking 3rd party games than the Switch was)

Didn't the PS4 start at 399$? while the Switch started at 299$ ?

So it was 100$ cheaper.  Maybe I am not remembering it right...

I think part of the reason, is while a home typically only has 1 console... a family would own multiple Switch's for each kid.
The price was low enough you could justify getting each kid their own.  That and many people, also got the Oled.
So the user base, is probably smaller than the sold units would suggest.
(that's basically like people saying part of why the PS2 sold well, was people wanted to be able to watch dvd's.)

This is also why I think Nintendo is more price sensitive than the other two.


Series X is 12 Tflops instead of 10.2....   and your right, that 20% doesn't seem valued much by the market as a whole.