Hiku said:
People using the term Jrpg made me understand what they were referring to without them having to mention specific games. In that sense, how classic Jrpg's started out wouldn't be a factor to someone who mainly associates them with turn based, and may not even be aware of action based titles like Dragon Slayer that predate Dragon Quest, Final Fantasy, Phantasy Star, etc, that popularized the genre and coined the phrase in the west. A Japanese developer can make a western style rpg, while a western developer can make a Japanese style one. But since ideas are more and more commonly borrowed between east and western style games, we often get games with elements from both. And Expedition 33 is no exception. Expedition 33's producer said that the director "wanted to have the kind of feeling that he imagined would have remained in modern Final Fantasy-like games, if they had kept doing turn-based stuff. But he also mixed lots of different inspirations. Final Fantasy and JRPGs are definitely the preeminent gameplay heritage we have. The defense system is more inspired by Sekiro and From Software games." |
People just choosing to be ignorant and wrong is what it is. Do you call BG3 a JRPG as well? Can I just call Xenoblade a WRPG? It has a mot of elements of those in them.
Last edited by Leynos - on 26 April 2025Bite my shiny metal cockpit!









