Ryuu96 said:
You've not explained at all why Putin needed to illegally invade another country, there is no such thing as legal or illegal in International Relations.Read some history books and you will learn The 'illegality' comes in, in relation to United Nations law.the United Nations to a large extent was a Western Undertaking after World War 1(League of Nations) & World War 2(United Nations). Russia's invasion was only called illegal by the West not the world.When West declares was illegally(according to your definition) on Afghanistan,Iraq,Libya,Syria, it is called legal but when the other side does it, you call it illegal
doesn't every country to do? kill hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians, doesn't every country to do? - again cripple his economy, etc... have you been following the Russian economy, it is doing fine, they shifted their exports from Europe to China,India,etc To "do what is necessary to run his country successfully" when Russia was mostly fine before this began it was fine but its future wasn't fine, USA was moving eastwards towards Russia with their Weapons, Putin didn't want USA nukes in Ukraine so close to his own country and its capital Moscow and had ample opportunity for further collaboration with Europe which would have massively benefited Russia and its population but instead chose caveman imperialism. yeah further collaboration, meaning Ukraine would become part of NATO & European Union and American & European troops & weapons placed so close to Moscow
Russia's lobbed hundreds of thousands of Russians to their deaths, to protect the Russian state & civilization, every country does this when faced with danger had an insurrection in their own country, i didn't hear of it are you even aware any economics, Russian economy is doing just fine. Inflatio but interest rates are high too to fight against inflation their military is battered, it seems like you consume alot of propaganda, Russia is actually winning the war all necessary for the survival of Russia civilization, you might not like it but Russians do By your logic, Hitler was one of the best world leaders, every country puts out their strongest leader but one side wins and one side loses, it happens in everything, even sports one side wins one side loses We don't have to give credit to these psychopaths, we don't need to call them the "best world leaders" because they're willing to go to war (Wtf?). what leader do you call best then? i am not saying going to war makes a leader good but it is necessary and every country tries to acquire as much land,money, resources, etc as they can If UK decided tomorrow to nuke America, this is fantasy talk UK can't Nuke America, America troops are stationed in UK. After World War 2, USA became the leader of the Western world meaning UK,etc are vassals of USA that way everybody is a psychopath stop consuming propaganda and start listening to news from both sides for a realistic outlook rather then consume Russia is Finished Propaganda of one side There ain't many people saying Blair and Bush were great leaders because they decided to bomb the shit out of the Middle East. they might not be great, but they were the destiny or USA & UK leaders so they did what was necessary |
~Banned -Ryuu96.
Last edited by Ryuu96 - on 13 April 2025






