Bandorr said:
When you use 'need' it feels like an attack. The switch is doing insanely well. You can't say they need it - when they clearly don't. You can say that "achievements are very popular videos on YouTube and will help promote the Switch/Switch 2". That can be your argument for them. But it's all an opinion. You're opinion is it will help the system sell more. But that's just an opinion. So you get to have your opinion. They get to have their opinion. No one is right, no one is wrong. I got Disgaea 5 on the switch because it had achievements built into the game. I didn't get Disgaea 1 because he had no achievements built in. Does the switch need achievements? No. Do I need them if I want to play certain games on the switch - yes. |
I never used the word "need" though. I was just paraphrasing what was written previously by another poster in this thread. Yes, I know it's an opinion. My point was we never got to that point of expressing our opinions because the notion of having an opinion on whether Nintendo having achievements would be better for the system was seen as an attack on the Switch. You are implying that by adding something, that it is lacking something.







