Jizz_Beard_thePirate said: |
They'll make a new T-shirt
Chazore said:
I personally do not think AMD gets the same right as Nvidia to just lock it down to RDNA4 like how Nvidia locks down the absolute latest tech to the 5000 series. Nvidia has the money, the tech, mindshare and brand power to command such a demand, but AMD barely has any of all that, so they really shouldn't be trying to outright copy Nvidia in terms of market moves. Imagine locking down their latest to their newest cards, only to find out they are priced $50 less like last gen, but still barely moves the needle.... that'd be the worst fucking move in a century. There is a time and a place to make such a move, Nvidia, much as I disagree with them, gets to make that move, AMD just doesn't, no matter how scientific we get about what tech allows to run on what cards, AMD just doesn't have that commanding power to make that kind of demand. |
The situation is very simple: Do the former RDNA architectures have the hardware parts necessary to run FRS$? If yes, then they should do it, period. If they don't, then AMD makes hardware, not miracles.
Nvidia didin't port DLSS to its 1000 and older cards because it needed the Tensor cores that the 2000 series came with. The same logic applies here.
Please excuse my bad English.
Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.