Carzy Zarx’s PC Gaming Emporium - Catch Up on All the Latest PC Gaming Related News

[JEMC]

Bofferbrauer2 said:

JEMC said:

So, what's the veredict for the 5070Ti?

From what I've seen, it's roughly on par with the 4080/4080S, faster in some games/resolutions, slower in others. Not a mindblowing upgrade, especially if you compare it to the 4070Ti Super, but it's a bigger jump than the 5080.

At $750, it's supposed to be an ok-ish card (I'm still not used to see xx70 cards that expensive), but anything over that and it loses much, if not all, its appeal.

By the way, it's both funny and sad how some reviews, mostly from youtube channels, mention AMD, asking for them to bring some common sense and competition... only to follow that by saying that they don't believe that because AMD has screwed things up too many times.

If AMD pays attention to reviews, which someone at AMD will, I hope the message gets past to the higher ups and don't mess up this chance.

GN says do not buy, HU is in a similar boat, as is Linus, so...

The performance uplift is only 7-12% in Raster and even less in RT compared to the 4070Ti Super, so very disappointing. And the MSRP is just for show, expect pricings to be closer to the 4080 Super than anywhere close to 4070Ti Super, let alone below it.

They all say to not buy it above MSRP, not to not buy it at all. Sadly, we all know too well that there'll be next to no stock of cards at official price and that they'll last nothing, being replaced by the more expensive siblings.

And yes, if you compare it to the 4070Ti Spuer, the jump isn't all that big, but it still puts it in the ballpark of the 4080, which is the least it could to, to match or top the peformance of the card one tier above it in the last gen. The 5080 couldn't even manage that.

Jizz_Beard_thePirate said:

JEMC said:

So, what's the veredict for the 5070Ti?

From what I've seen, it's roughly on par with the 4080/4080S, faster in some games/resolutions, slower in others. Not a mindblowing upgrade, especially if you compare it to the 4070Ti Super, but it's a bigger jump than the 5080.

At $750, it's supposed to be an ok-ish card (I'm still not used to see xx70 cards that expensive), but anything over that and it loses much, if not all, its appeal.

By the way, it's both funny and sad how some reviews, mostly from youtube channels, mention AMD, asking for them to bring some common sense and competition... only to follow that by saying that they don't believe that because AMD has screwed things up too many times.

If AMD pays attention to reviews, which someone at AMD will, I hope the message gets past to the higher ups and don't mess up this chance.

The performance for the msrp is good but majority of the cards are inflated at $900-$1000 prices which is not worth it. If the price was actually at $750-$800, it would certainly be worth buying since it's essentially 4080 performance for $250 less but that is not the case currently.

The question really is how the 9070 XT will perform and it's price. The balls in Radeons court and it's up to them to make Nvidia's prices not look good.

With the 5070Ti and the 4080 so close in performance, it almost feels like Nvidia could have saved time and money and just rebrand the older GPU with the price cut.

The ball being on AMD isn't reassuring at all. They're not good jugglers. And price only matters relative to the performance. If the 6070XT performs like the 5070Ti at the same $750, it'll be perceived as bad value, but if by some miracle it performs like a 5080 (which it won't), then it will be great value and will put Nvidia to shame.

But whatever, we'll see what AMD has planned in 8/9 days and what happens after that.