Pemalite said:
killer7 said:
I know some people see it different. Some of them are younger and did not live through the gens. I experienced the NES launch as a small kid. I am sorry but i can't just "mix up" generations. Some people say Switch is Gen 8, i even heard some saying gen 7 because its closer to PS3/ Xbox 360 power than Ps4/ XboxOne but i cannot agree with this. Its just my opinion but console generations should not be defined in power. It was like this in the 80s and 90s as well as in the early 2000s. It was 2006 when this confuzing deffinitions started because of the Wii. I also don't say DC and PS2 would be gen 5.5 only because they are clearly inferior to Gamecube and Xbox. Is the 3DS another generation than the Vita? Or is the DS another generation than the PSP? We should take this into account i think.
|
It's not mixing up. It's a reclassification based on a set number of variables.
It's like looking through a database where you can sort and group different values based on specific values.
If people wish to categorize console generations based on power alone rather than company release cadence, year or hardware features... It actually doesn't make them wrong, it just makes their approach different from other established norms.
|
No. Everyone has their opinion. If i want to say David Bowie is another Generation than the Rolling Stones, despite the fact they where making music in the same time and and i take the argument that Bowie already died but the Rolling Stones are still alive and in the music business i can say that of course.🙂 I can also say that ACDC are not part of that generation because their style of music is different...