By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Ryuu96 said:
konnichiwa said:

Indiana being 14th is kind of bad and the excuse but it is only on xbox and steam is not a good one (steam chart was correct).

I'd take the mans opinion whose entire career is based around this over a random forum user.

14 across all platforms in sales, 4 on Xbox in sales with 3 massive IPs above it. Engagement on Xbox is still tracking incredibly well based on Achievements unlocked and TrueAchievements data and it has maintained strong position in Players charts on Xbox for over a month now so is seemingly performing well on Game Pass. Game Pass cleaves sales as expected and it's only available on Xbox/PC in December.

It seems to have underperformed on Steam but done great on Xbox and overall done "pretty good" because Steam isn't the only factor of success and CCU especially isn't the only factor of success and I wish people would stop obsessing over CCU for every single game when CCU's factors vary from game to game. Should have been a bit of fun but it is being ruined like Meta.

So a "pretty good" start with strong legs on Xbox and a future port to PS which will boost it.

You don't need to engage with my opinion but it was clear from release that the numbers on steam was not great it seems to be the case that a game like Starfield did around 10 times more in sales and then we are not even talking about the highest peak of players 330k for starfield compared to 12K for Indiana Jones. Being 14th on the charts for a high budget /well known IP just doesn't seem good especially when the first 13 are not new and some of them are only on one platform. Game deserved better.