Kasz216 on 08 July 2008
| The Ghost of RubangB said: Like I mentioned in the other thread that got locked, there's a lot of evidence that any time a group of people of one sex are stuck together for a long period of time, they start to have sex with each other whether they're gay or not. Prisons, pirates, the Navy, the Army, coal mines, gold prospectors, cowboys, etc. And in a lot of harems, when the king or whoever isn't around and there's 50-100 women locked in a palace, they'll party with each other. This currently happens in some middle eastern areas where the women can't show their face outside. You marry 10 women, lock them up at home, and won't let them show their face outside, so they stay home and have sex all day. But yeah, this doesn't make any of these people gay. Everything I've studied has led to me believing that the sexuality isn't defined by the acts but by the romantic/emotional desire/love/trust. Hey have you ever heard the laws about sex in Sparta back then? They're awesome. |
Well that's the thing. Currently it is defined by the acts done.
Whether that definition needs to be changed or not is the issue.
In which case i need to ask... "Why bother having a definition."
If you base it on romantic,emotional desire, love and trust. There is really no point in declaring straight or gay until you get your particular life partner down. In which point, there is no reason to label it. Since your unavailable anyway.
Which laws do you mean though? Only one i remember off hand is the having to sneak into your wifes tent thing.
