the-pi-guy said:
Again, "following more rules" does not make someone more moral. Philosophers don't even agree on a single definition of what makes someone more moral in the first place. There are some frameworks that suggest that there is some set of rules that are objectively good, there are some frameworks that suggest that most sets of moral rules are just as moral as each other. I'm not aware of any system that suggests that "following more rules" makes someone more moral. As I explained before, it's an absurd suggestion in the first place, because the number of rules someone follows is arbitrary.Â
Christianity technically forbids homosexuality, female pastors; yet lots of Christian sects are very progressive. Besides that, either you think all religions are equally valid, or you think most/all of them are made up. If it's the latter, then you would have to accept that people are going to follow their religion however they want. Even if other versions of that religion forbid them from following it. If it's the former, then you should still have to accept that different followings of any religion are going to happen. Even by your own admission, people have rules they aren't following. So why is it different for religion? Doesn't even matter if you don't want to call them Muslim, if they're some new religion, that must be just as valid. |
is the context still "woke" games?
I thought most muslim countries view homosexuallity as a death penality.
These are not countries or peoples, that are accepting of that sort of stuff, in video games either imo.
Not sure how big a market, the muslim world is for video games or buying them.
But it all circles back to "the consumer is always right" (if you want to sell them something).
or stand on principle, or and ignore that potential market.