sc94597 said:
Sorry, I didn't mean to put words in your mouth. Was talking more generally, as I've seen a lot of people who are skeptical of the impact of this research compare it to crypto-currencies and the metaverse. I think at the very minimum, regardless of whether human-level autonomous agents are created in the next half-decade or so (although I think they will be), even with the current technologies that already exist there is going to be a lot of economic dislocation. That alone is a "world-changing" impact. We are very close to a huge number of office and call center jobs being fully automated. These are median-income jobs that many economies (and more importantly -- families) depend on. Even without AGI, these technologies probably will be world-changing in that they are already having an effect on head-counts and potentially causing more un(der)-employment. |
No worries, Lol. Understood.
It's definitely not crypto-currency or the metaverse and you work with it so clearly have a better understanding of it than I do. The medical field is one area where I've been a lot more positive about the uses of AI in and largely I just think we can explore all its uses there. I've heard a lot of positive uses of AI in the medical field, a lot of things which help medical professions without replacing them.
It's the tech companies I distrust but that might be because I distrust them on a general basis, Lol. AGI feels like nobody is quite sure when/if it's possible but it just feels like a constant stream of "AGI is right around the corner, continue to invest billions" and it's still not here years later, then repeat the same statement, and investors are investors at the end of the day, I'm not sure how long they're going to wait.
But I could be thinking too narrow, I do agree AI will cause a lot of job losses and yeah, that would be a significant change to many job sectors, albeit a negative change, especially if Governments do nothing to help them which they probably won't but it's exactly why we need more regulations to protect peoples livelihoods and abuse of AI.
In a scenario where large portions of the population are now jobless and skint because AI has taken their jobs, I suppose that would have to cause capitalism to be replaced too, because capitalism relies on an ever increasing growth line, if there's a decline or even stagnant growth the capitalist world pisses itself but who is going to be buying produce when people are jobless and skint? Especially if the Government doesn't help them out.