Mnementh said:
LOL. An upside to this is that AAA industry slop cannot be longer called "at least a 7", just because it is mostly free of bugs and models and systems are kinda polished. I always hate this way of thinking, because that still means lack of creativity. Basically Concord: there is nothing wrong of it if you just check technological or graphical checkboxes, yet it failed to resonate with gamers. AI supported studios can do similar things pretty quick I think, some polished stuff that checks basic boxes but without creativity. Still, I think small indies can profit by AI as well. The humans inject creativity, while AI is used to scale it bigger than a small team can on their own. This might be a way of the future. |
Of course there are decent uses for AI in videogame development, AI isn't anything new at the end of the day, it has been used for dozens of years already and it can be beneficial to small indie teams in other ways, it entirely depends on where/what/how it is used but I seriously doubt all these "worker first" and more altruistic uses of AI are what these billionaire twats like Musk have in mind, hence the need for regulation/unions, etc. Billionaires like Musk, Microsoft, and others, just want to use AI to fire as many workers as possible and pump out soulless factory-like games. But governments have been absolutely fucking useless at regulating AI so far.
Last edited by Ryuu96 - 5 hours ago