By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

General - Global warming? - View Post

I'm still not seeing any evidence that it's not man-made.

Why is it that the only people who say it's fake are individual scientists but every group of scientists in the world say it's man-made and dangerous?

Why believe a handful of individual scientists over the scientific community as a whole, who are subject to peer review? Do you think that 99% of the scientists are "in on it" or something, and there are just a handful of scientists who actually care about the scientific method and the truth and all that crap?

If you want to know how scientists actually feel about this, here's a list of a few dozen reports, all saying the same thing:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change

On any issue, you can find a couple individual scientists who are full of shit and you can pay them to say whatever you want. That's why they have peer review and we can see what the entire scientific community says as a whole, and weed the nutjobs out.




And why's everybody ganging up on my previous post? The temperatures are rising. That's a fact. If they keep rising, the icecaps will melt completely and drown all the coasts in the world, which is where a majority of all cities are located. That's a fact. If you want to argue either of those facts, cite some sources.

Whether it's caused by humans or not, when faced with those 2 facts, wouldn't you want to try to stop it? Or is your argument seriously going to be "oh it's just natural for us all to get wiped out by global warming, so fuck it let's all die it's nature lulz." ?