Jumpin said:
Sega’s Saturn and Dreamcast were unique, the PlayStation and PS2 just happened to clone them and have more usable features, a better price, and better marketing and third party relations. Nintendo tends to be at its best when it’s not trying to align with other console manufacturers (particularly Gamecube) - because they end up coming off like the kiddy/junior version of the original. NES, Gameboy, DS, Wii, and Switch all went against the current and discovered new oceans. Of course, once in a while they accidentally land in a smaller lake (N64), or travel up shit creek (Virtual Boy and Wii U). Regardless, I buy every Nintendo console. But most Nintendo fans don’t, and will be fine skipping whole generations. Look at guys like Mike Matei who is still a fanatical NES/SNES guy. |
Interesting take on the subject especially with PlayStation cloning the Saturn when the Saturn did a 11th hour change to it's CPU design making it a dual CPU setup when it got wind of the PS1's 3D capabilities.
Research shows Video games help make you smarter, so why am I an idiot