PooperScooper on 07 July 2008
| bumidan said: I looked back and saw what you are talking about PooperScooper. I still think this is the best way to analyze incomplete information. Like I mentioned before, if you have more accurate numbers, by all means, let us know. By the way, just to let you know, the assumption (i don't know how to make it red) I used in this prediction is that MSFT MAKES $20 on average per console for the quarter Apr to Jun 2008. In my other Sony prediction thread, the assumption for PS3 hardware is that Sony LOSES $150 per console for the quarter Apr to Jun 2008. http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=31393&start=0 Whether you think those are close of way off, (along with other assumptions), IF THE PREDICTIONS are within the 10% range that you would be satisfied with, then would you AGREE that the assumptions are not that bad?? |
Okay I'm back. Now I don't mind your predictions. Predicting can be quite fun actually. The thing I about all of this is how you post. I know you aren't trying to make it seem like what I am about to say but bare with me for a bit.
You post numbers and it is all formated and such and some people might stumble on it and take your posts as facts. A lot of people out there don't understand differences between a random guy on the forums assuming things to get certain figures and company approved data that is released.
And the whole reason why I made the assumption all red in the other post is because when people see that word red flags should start going off.
