By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Tober said:

Been watching some reactions on US newschannels like ABC, MSBC and CNN. They are all talking about that Harris' campaign is not to blame. That it was great! Not surprisingly, because there are a $1 Billion reasons not too.

They sure don't want to piss of the DMC or have them thinking "mmmm, perhaps we should not have sunk a huge part of that campaign money in ads on traditional media channels. Let's do that different next time".

So instead they blame, who would have guessed, the Voter.

Identity group-A did not show up, Identity group-B dissapointed, Identity group-C are cultist, Identity group-D what where they thinking?!

As a previous poster on this treat pointed out, Liberal policies seem to be more popular. If so, it must be a messaging issue, a.k.a. Campaign issue. But you'll never hear these pundits say that.

Agreed. During election night CNN already remarked on the difference between campaigning efforts.

Republican campaigns much more targeted on social media as well as sending letters to older voters. The democrats boast about knocking on doors, yet those kind of pushy tactics usually leaves a negative after image on me.

I do wonder how much social engineering played a role this time
https://www.npr.org/2018/03/20/595338116/what-did-cambridge-analytica-do-during-the-2016-election

Ironic, conservatives are much more aware of the changing times, much more able to adapt to how to reach different demographics, while the progressives seem to be stuck in the past when it comes to campaigning.