| Gettysburg4 said: So do I ;) But the thing is I can't emphasise enough how much diversity interferes with being able to curtail elite dysfunction (hey there is a reason it was top down pushed on the population, even if it seems now there is grass roots support for it - from the brainwashed). A homogenous population tends to largely agree on how things should be run - which is to say, the gap between one side and another within society tends to be much narrower, as there are no "new entrants" a marginalised view can pull to itself to bolster its appearance of support. The elite that had burrowed into UK, France and America were not benign, and nor were the elite in charge of Germany during its Weimar period, or the elite that took control of Russia during its revolution. Despite whatever criticism could be levelled at them (and people should understand the people that told them the history they believe in, are not benign actors themselves, with a severe interest in casting eyes elsewhere than on themselves, while draping themselves in unearned merit), the leaders of Italy, and Germany in ww2 were *sincerely* interested in advancing their people and doing good for them. And this is important because this *does not* describe the leadership in the West through the 20th century, nor today, nor the leadership that was in control of the Soviet Union (who had a passionate hatred for the people and their customs.. note the persecution of Christians, execution of the Holodomor and more). So these people have always been bad, but now have a society that is unable to in any way resist or control them, heck more than half the population cannot even point to who these people are, and identify their projects, or articulate why they are bad. And these people want Whites gone, and Christians gone, and they have no genuine love for anyone else but their own set either.. ..and now gifted control of societies and tech that enable them to.. they can do whatever they like with the world and its people. Enslavement and genocide are the only possibilities because the force that can hold these people to account: high IQ, homogenous societies, filled with a people who know who they are, and have a belief in protecting their interests, have already been dissolved by diversity and anti-racism programming. It is no coincidence the only society that can muster enough force to see them off, or stand as a potential rival, has exactly the strength and self-belief and sense of self they have outlawed in the West as racism. Islam has the bodies, but not the tech and engineers and scientists of the Jews and Chinese. ...But think about it.. who can hold the globalist elite to account? The left (unironically financed by the same elite) would claim that they could (just as soon as they put down the racists), but where does that lead but to civil war and collapse? Actionable by the same elite at any time. Islamists? The high tech weapons and manufacturing capability is outside their reach and in elite hands. Chinese? Maybe. Anyone else? Too riven by internal conflict or too small or too behind in tech, manufacturing and ability. No global body is holding these entities to account, because they furnish their members and furnish the public their impressions of the same institutions via their media and non-profits. The left ultimately destroyed the ability to make an equal world by being fooled into attacking their own people, who, despite their faults, were always a basically good people, who had- when they had sufficient unity and homogeneity, the ability (even if latent) to confront the elite and prevent the elite from going too far. |
This is mr gettysburg trololo'ing, while joyful with a zest for life
