padib said:
LegitHyperbole said:
It's the stupidest and most awkward comparison for so many reasons regardless wheter you think they are dominating. 120 million acrive PS players monthly across the brand to 128 million active on Nintendo Switch but AGAIN, it's got a cross over between handheld and console and the timing is silly comparison. It's like grouping the DS, 3Ds and Wii together to say they are dominating the market. Just ridiculous. Nonsensical and statistical manipulation to prove "dominance". They are market leader, I'm happy for them but to say they are dominating is facetious.
23% use switch docked. 77% handheld. Dominance, lol. Sure.
And no they wouldn't, people buy into Nintendo (especially handheld nintendo) for such vastly different reasons. One of the brands ceasing to exist isn't going to bump the other brand drastically. Most would probably go PC handheld.
|
Your challenge is lazy. What breakdown do you propose to compare then? I'll take the time to put the numbers together. Also how did you quantify active players?
|
Maybe instead of total sales for the systems you could use the amount sold in the same time period
Edit - I reread your post comparing console plus handheld sales and saw you already did this for gameboy, which was what I thought the other person's problem was with the comparison. So never mind
Last edited by SuperJortendo - on 27 October 2024