Cyran said:
I don't bother anymore as SSD durability is plenty for my uses these days but when I first started using a SSD, I would use a Ramdisk for all my temp folders, cookies, and page file (because windows can be dumb and complain when page files disabled even through I had more then enough ram to not need it). The thinking at the time was preventing all these tiny writes/reads to/from the SSD that would reduce it life span. Sata SSD's was expensive back when I did that and there was still a lot of concern about how long a SSD could last. As for performance, I think most software fairly good a caching important stuff to ram if it available anyway so not sure there a huge performance increase using a ram disk that would be worth the trouble of setting it up and maintaining. |
Interesting. When I read about it was for the speed and responsiveness that a RAM drive gave over the slow mechanical drives or even the fast Velociraptors.
Makes sense to use A RAM disk to save read/writes on SSDs back then, even if now we use drives that have a fraction of the endurance and are ok with it. Sometimes it's weird how things change.
Thanks for sharing.
Please excuse my bad English.
Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.