By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Jules98 said:
SecondWar said:

If its to do with Pokeball captures, they why only Palworld and not Coromon, TemTem or Cassette Beasts?

They all use similar capture mechanics with the main difference being the items. 

You're kinda answering your own question here. The fact that Palworld uses a ball-shaped object for the catching as opposed to literally anything else (cards, triangles, fidget spinners, etc.) may very well be the sticking point.

If that’s really what Nintendo are basing their claim on then it seems a very flimsy claim. If its the Pokeball itself then that feels more like a copyright or trademark issue than a patent. A patent around the gameplay mechanic would surely be more concerned with the capturing mechanic rather than the item used for capturing.

An that’s what Mnemneth is saying as well - ‘throwing an object at a creature in the overworld’, not ‘use of a ball-shaped object to catch a creature’. The former would also mean Coromon and TemTem with an issue, whilst Cassette Beasts might get off as you don’t through the cassette to catch in that game.