By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
PDF said:
Renamed said:

It's less about Clinton himself and more about having 3 current/prior presidents directly support Harris.  It's a rub in the face of Trump who had 0 do the same for him.  Yeah, I know, only 1 former R POTUS besides himself left alive anyway but the point is to show who has support and who doesn't.

I understand but its pointless. We all know they support her, it doesn't help her campaign at all. Instead it gives R's talking points for a night that dems are hypocrites for criticizing Trump's sexism/assault on women while clapping like seals for Bill Clinton.  

No one but dem party loyalists care to see the Clinton's and the persuadable voters Kamala is trying to go after do not like them. I say this as someone who actually is a fan of theirs.

As the expression goes, "There's no there there."   Persuadable voters are have the following 2 choice:

1. Support Harris despite having a former president alleged to have sexually assaulted someone show up 1 night at her DNC nomination.

2. Support Trump despite himself being found guilty by a jury of committing sexual assault.

So you're stating that these persuadables are going to be mad at Harris for allowing Clinton to speak for an hour and suddenly support Trump?  Seriously, if they do not like Bill Clinton, how the hell do you think they feel about Mr. "Grab 'em by the pussy"?  And hearing more faux outrage from Fox is a drop in the bucket, faux outrage is all they do.  Potential Harris voters aren't likely listening to Fox anyway.  Besides, Fox complaining about Bill's alleged sexual assault but giving Trump a free pass is the ultimate hypocrisy.   

Last edited by Renamed - on 14 August 2024

To the privileged, equality feels like oppression.