By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
BFR on 09 August 2024
Edit Thread
Mnementh said:
BFR said:

3. Over the course of the war, the US did not find any of the WMDs, including the chemical ones.  Which means, that either his guys destroyed them or sent them to another country like Syria.

We did not find evidence to our claim, so the evidence must've been destroyed. No, no, we were never wrong. That can't be. It must be that the evidence was destroyed.

Your ignoring the Halabja attack, which the US and the world strongly condemned.

"The Halabja massacre took place in Iraqi Kurdistan on 16 March 1988, when thousands of Kurds were killed by a large-scale Iraqi chemical attack. 

To date, the Halabja massacre remains the largest chemical weapons attack directed against a civilian-populated region in human history,[5] killing between 3,200 and 5,000 people and injuring 7,000 to 10,000 more.

In 2010, the Supreme Iraqi Criminal Tribunal officially defined the Halabja chemical attack as a genocidal massacre against the Kurdish people during the time of Iraqi president Saddam Hussein."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halabja_massacre

Last edited by BFR - on 09 August 2024