Ryuu96 said:
The recent strike only destroyed one plane and damaged another. Issue is that drones are far easier to intercept, far less likely to destroy a plan, they've been multiple drone strikes on Russian airfields that have resulted in no aircraft destroyed using dozens of drones. ATACMS Cluster would have been far more likely to wipe out a bunch of jets before Russia could have moved them back and while Russia being forced to move them back is beneficial to Ukraine in a few ways, it would have been way more preferable if more jets could have been destroyed, now it's too late. What should have happened is Ukraine, America and allies come to an agreement in private that Ukraine can use missiles on Russia, Ukraine then surprise attacks Russian airfields with ATACMS Cluster + Storm Shadow and then after that Russia is forced to move back their jets. Dozen long-range missiles could have wiped out far more jets than 100+ drones. |
I agree. Russia may also be wasting missles against the drones, I just don't know though. Or perhaps Russia is using its old Soviet gun based anti aircraft. Politically, I don't think that Trump would ever lift the ban on attacking anything inside Russia and harris will always want to play things by the book, meaning that nothing will change next year. However, Ukraine is making more and more long range range drones. This month has had a tremendous amount of attacks inside Russia already. Ukraine may have to just use cheap drones to win this war and it will be quite interesting if they can pull it off.