PDF said:
Ryuu96 said:
I don't think Beshear would be a terrible pick, I'd think that would have to be someone who would damage Harris campaign, like JD Vance, Lol. I do think Beshear is the "safe" pick though in the sense that I don't believe he'd hurt Harris but I don't believe he'd aid her campaign much either, he obviously won't flip Kentucky and I reckon would have a very minor effect outside of Kentucky. Beshear is essentially the "do no harm" idea when picking a VP, Beshear of all the candidates has the least baggage so he'll be fine, though I do also agree he's a pretty bland orator. I'd want Kelly or Walz. But if you need Shapiro for Pennsylvania...Then it can't really be anyone else can it? PA is too important to the election. If you can't be sure you can win it without Shapiro then I don't see it being anyone else. If you don't need Shapiro to win PA then my brain says Kelly but my heart says Walz...I think Kelly still has the best national appeal but Walz is so damn charming, Lol. |
That's fair. I also fully agree with the rest. It looks like it is going to be Shapiro or Walz. I fully believe Shapiro is the best choice between the two but Walz is so damn likeable. I won't be upset if he is chosen. |
I really thought Kelly would make the "final" stage, I wonder what made her drop him, I'd love to be a fly on the wall 
I wouldn't have been upset at any of them. Just thought Kelly, Walz and Shapiro were the strongest. Beshear is fine and Pete is awesome but wouldn't do much for Harris. Tbh, I trust Harris has done her homework no matter who she picks, if it's Walz then I guess she has good reason to believe they can win PA without Shapiro. If she picks Shapiro then it's probably because they need him for PA.
