zeldaring said:
Pemalite said:
It's not. But keep believing it.
You still haven't provided a counter to the visuals in Crysis 3 by showcases GTA5 visuals that were intrinsically better.
But hey, if a random youtube fan video from someone random of unimportance that reinforces your confirmation bias is all you have to backup your so called "argument"... Then you don't have an argument.
zeldaring said:
Graphics, lighting, volumetric clouds, draw distance, object density, even underwater is fully modeled, NPC density and complexity, you could knock people's guns, hats and glasses off, great AI, NPC interactions, real-time cutscenes with seamless transitions to gameplay and vice versa, facial animations, horse muscle simulation, car physics and deformation that no other AAA game could reach and more. That's all in last gen games on PS3/X360 sorry it's shit on every game and your opinion is not gonna change my mind. |
I don't think you fully grasp how impressive CryEngine actually is.
But watch and weep.
|
Ok how this run on 360/ps3. It's run terrible and sub HD . Gtav is replicating a whole city as realistic as possible with actually believable world is , just the traffic simulation alone is more complex then anything in botw which just barren waste land. Anyone with common sense would know the level of calculations need to run a city with tons of npcs and car traffic as well as air traffic in a packed city would know it's gonna have way more tasks to calculate then some woods or jungle area. The wiiu would crumbed to 15-20fps trying to run gtav with that terrible cpu. Just look at botw in kokorki village, how drops frame hard and that's not even close to as complex the amount of things going in gtav. |
It is running on 360.
Go back and actually watch the video and try again.
