| zeldaring said: In your opinion naughty dogs games are more techically demanding then anything on 360 but it's really impossible to confirm this. |
This is absolutely false. - You can confirm it.
Just by looking at what techniques and graphics features are being deployed and at what kind of scale.
| zeldaring said: I would say GTAV is more demanding then anything on those consoles of course it doesn't have the looks. also FORZA horzion looks stunning and makes gt5 look like crap. |
GTA 5 has different processing loads.
| zeldaring said: also FORZA horzion looks stunning and makes gt5 look like crap. |
Budgets. They make a difference.
| zeldaring said: It also not rocket science that if it is more powerful in real world performance it would eventually be able to show in some games, like it was a long gen where are these multiplaform games that actually take advantage of the power and prove it, not many big gap in thousands of games. |
No one is arguing that the Xbox 360 had more multiplats that looked and ran better, that's not even up for debate.
The Xbox 360 had a better development environment.
But the Playstation 3 had superior hardware... Which I find baffling that you are even trying to debate that.
| zeldaring said: so basically we are stuck with uncharted 3 being the show case and the reason for ps3 being more powerful in your opinion which is subjective and also can be based on the skill of the devloper. in the end it's more powerful on paper but no developer could actually take advanatge in real world perfomance. |
It's not subjective.
Many developers took advantage of the Playstation 3's higher performance ceiling and hardware capabilities.
--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--
