Darc Requiem said:
Am I mistaken or is RDNA3.5 just a re-taped out version of RDNA3 that hits it's original performance targets? IIRC RDNA3 missed AMD's intended performance numbers by 15% to 20%. I get the impression that Radeon's budget/resources are really limited in comparison to Ryzen. It really shows in how they move. The most recent example being FSR. They didn't have the resources to work on improving the upscaler and Frame Generation. So they just focused on the latter leading to FSR being stuck at 2.2 for well over a year. A refreshed RDNA3.5 lineup akin to Nvidia's "Super" series could have been interesting. I'm not sure what kind of naming scheme they could have went with, but a 7900XT based on RDNA3.5 would likely have matched the current 7900XTX. While a RDNA3.5 based 7900XTX would still fall short of the 4090, it still would be ahead of the 4080/4080 Super by 15% to 20% in Raster. |
I remember the rumors about AMD missing the target they had with RDNA3, with those leaks of the cards hitting 3GHz, but I don't know if they were ever confirmed.
The refreshed products could have certainly put more pressure on Nvidia, but we'll never know what would have happened. The naming scheme could have been the same one used with the previous gen, adding a xx50 to the new cards (7950XTX, 7850XT, 7750XT, ...).
And yes, AMD really needs to step up their software teans. Maybe the article Jizz posted some days ago about AMD moving on to become a software company first is a sign of things to come, hopefully sooner rather than later.
Please excuse my bad English.
Currently gaming on a PC with an i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070
Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.